GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY WOULD BRING GREAT BENEFITS TO OHIO

As we enter the final months of the 128th General Assembly, I hope that the Ohio House will take action to make state government work in the best interest of Ohio’s citizens. With 10.5 percent of Ohioans unemployed, it is clear that current laws and tax rates restrict the growth of small businesses and propel them to relocate to other states, taking thousands of jobs with them. This trend has become a status quo in Ohio, with many lawmakers still wondering why we can’t hold on to jobs and economic opportunity. However, if we don’t significantly change the way Ohio does business, can we really be surprised when we continue to hemorrhage jobs?




When my colleagues and I reconvene in the fall, I will continue to urge the passage of legislation that makes government more efficient and decreases the cost to taxpayers. My fellow Republican representatives and I have introduced numerous cost-saving proposals to address the issue of out-of-control spending and government bloat.



House Bill 25, for example, would consolidate state agencies and fix the business climate through a leaner, more responsive government. Currently, Ohio has 24 cabinet level departments and more than 300 boards and commissions, many of which operate inefficiently and needlessly drain state funding. HB 25 would reorganize the cabinet level departments into 11 core missions, eliminating excess payroll, overlapping services and bureaucratic red tape. It is projected that the consolidation would save Ohio taxpayers $1 billion annually.



With Ohio facing a projected $8 billion budget deficit, cost-saving initiatives such as HB 25 would minimize the tax burden on Ohio’s citizens and ensure that vital areas of the budget are funded. Being among the highest taxed people in the nation, Ohioans have less discretionary income to put into local businesses, which directly affects the state’s ability to create jobs. The current biennial budget needlessly increases spending and the need to tax Ohioans at a time when accountable spending and job creation should be the priority.



When my colleagues and I reconvene in November, I would also like to see the consideration of HB 302, legislation I introduced in October 2009. HB 302 is another cost-saving measure that can help put Ohio on the road to economic recovery. When enacted, HB 302 will prohibit using American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) 2009 funds on signs that indicate a project was funded with ARRA dollars. These signs, which you may have seen on local construction projects, cost $1,300 apiece. For these signs, Ohio has forfeited $1 million in stimulus funding that could have been directed toward job creation.



Both of these proposals are examples of the action we can take to reduce wasteful spending and get Ohioans back to work. As your neighbor and a father, I think there is nothing more important than getting Ohio’s economy back on track so there will be more employment opportunities for our citizens and children. If we continue to run our finances into the ground, our economy will continue to falter. My fellow state legislators and I should use the sessions in the fall to protect our economic future.

Ohio's Economy Continues to Struggle

As you are well aware, Ohio’s economy has continued to struggle while other states have seen a slight economic rebound. Unlike many of our neighbors, our economy cannot grow because our tax rate is so high. If we were able to lower taxes, small businesses would have more income to hire new employees and businesses across the state would expand because Ohioans would be spending more. However, House Democrats raised taxes in 2009 and passed a budget last July that will cost the taxpayers for years to come.



The biennial budget, which passed in 2009, increased spending by $1 billion in 2010 and $950 million more in 2011. Tax revenue alone cannot fund this budget nor repair the state’s deficit. The Office of Budget and Management projected that the state’s tax revenue will grow by $974 million in the next two years, but will not reach the $5 billion necessary to replace the losses from this budget’s out of control spending.

To otherwise fund this spending, the governor proposed 150 new fees that will take nearly $1 billion from the wallets of the taxpayers. Additionally, the budget usurps $8.5 billion from one-time sources that could have been more wisely spent. On top of these sources, the state received $900 million more from the taxpayers after Ohio’s Democrats passed House Bill 318, which repealed the final installment of the income tax reductions and raised your 2009 income tax rate by 4.2 percent.


With the government reform initiatives my Republican colleagues and I proposed, the state would have saved more than $1 billion annually. Our proposals include legislation to streamline the bloated executive branch and to weed out wasteful Medicaid spending. We found areas where we can painlessly eliminate excess spending; however, the House Democrats decided to cut spending from the areas that need funding the most, including education and elderly health care programs. Their shortsighted moves will jeopardize important programs and will not pay off in the long run.


Raising my three children in Beavercreek, I frequently think about their future here in Ohio and whether there will be enough incentives for them to stay when they are considering colleges and careers. I fear that our state will not grow jobs and hold as many economic opportunities for them if we continue to overspend and burden our taxpayers. All parents hope that their children will have as many opportunities—if not more—than they had, and I would like to do my part to make this a reality for all of our children in the Buckeye State.

Martin Joins State Lawmakers To Oppose Cap and Trade Trickery From Washington

COLUMBUS — Ohio State Representative Jarrod Martin (R-Beavercreek) today was joined by his fellow caucus members in signing and delivering letters to U.S. Senators George V. Voinovich and Sherrod Brown, regarding deep concern of the cap and trade and other impairing regulations.

“I fully support efforts to make the United States more energy independent and to protect the environment. However, it is doubtful these proposals would have any impact and would punish Ohio consumers with increased energy costs,” Martin said. “Our economy continues to struggle. We will not be helping anyone by putting into place policies that would drive more businesses out of Ohio and increase energy costs for every consumer."

In the letters, House Republicans outlined growing concerns of the economic consequences of legislative or administrative efforts to implement cap and trade policies or to regulate carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases as pollutants. Moreover, concerns in the letter also expressed that Ohio is so reliant on these energy producers that these increased costs are really another tax in disguise that will impact all Ohioans. The implementation of these policies would be extremely damaging to Ohio’s long-term success and budget sustainability.

House Republicans hope to encourage Senators Voinovich and Brown to oppose cap and trade and other proposed greenhouse gas regulations and assert that as the state budget continues to face ongoing revenue shortfalls, establishing new taxes on traditional energy sources as a way to subsidize will lead to a steeper economic downfall.

Cap and Trade Letter to Senators Voinovich and Brown

Fee Increases Are Not A Budget Solution

Ohio’s economic crisis has presented lawmakers with the unique opportunity to examine state spending, rein in costs and create a more efficient, effective government structure. However, many of Ohio’s leaders chose to maintain the tax-and-spend status quo by placing a heavier financial burden on the people of our state.

Instead of creating a sustainable state budget, Governor Strickland and House Democrats raised taxes and created more than 150 new fines, fees and penalties to support Ohio’s ever-growing government spending. Specifically, these fees will affect each and every Ohioan because they will be imposed on everything from court costs and birth certificates to real estate licenses and hospice applications.

One way the Democrats are nickel-and-diming their way to a balanced budget is through a $20 late fee for renewing your vehicle registration and driver’s license. Since October, 400,000 individuals have been forced to pay this late fee, which has fattened the budget by more than $6 million to benefit the tax and spend party that is in control.

In times of economic hardship, state government should shrink its spending to fit its means, not grab at constituents’ pocketbooks to feed its growth. For this reason, I cosponsored legislation to repeal this $20 BMV late fee on motor vehicle registrations, driver’s licenses and motorcycle endorsements. House Bill 428, introduced by Representatives Ron Amstutz and Terry Boose, has bipartisan support in the House and will help keep Ohio’s government accountable to the public.


It is my belief that the government should serve the people, not the other way around. The day we start squeezing petty dollars out of hardworking families is the day we should finally commit to cost-saving measures to rein in state spending. There is no excuse to justify robbing the taxpayers of money that could have been used to put food on the table or help pay their bills—especially when there are so many alternatives on the table.

Since the beginning of the General Assembly, House Republicans have proposed numerous bills that would streamline state spending, reduce Medicaid waste and audit state agencies. Most of all, these bills would hold Ohio’s elected officials accountable for their expenditures and ensure that each dollar spent has a dollar’s return. Together, our bills would increase government efficiency by saving the taxpayers more than $1 billion annually, which would not only put our state on track toward a balanced budget but also eliminate the temptation to raid the wallets of our constituents.


Ohio has a spending problem, not a revenue problem. It is long overdue that state leaders stop pilfering money from individuals who are just trying to make an honest living and provide for their families. As always, I will continue the fight for an accountable, efficient state government.

2009-2010: Commitment, Fulfillment, and Moving Forward

As we approach the 2010 campaign season, I would like to take a moment to share with you some of the issues I have been working on over the last thirteen months as your State Representative.

Commitment

You may recall during my campaign that I committed to working on legislation to:

· Encourage the growth of existing businesses and promote jobs

· Put an end to wasteful government spending

· Improve our schools

· Limit the role of government in our daily lives

· Defend our rights, proud traditions and strong conservative values, including the rights of the unborn and the rights of our law-abiding gun owners

Fulfillment

Below is an abbreviated description of legislation that I have sponsored in an effort to uphold my commitments to you:

· HCR 11: To claim sovereignty over certain powers pursuant to the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America

· HCR 14: To request that the members of the United States Congress refrain from enacting the Fairness Doctrine into law.

· HCR 15: To memorialize the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency to refrain from adopting any new regulations governing greenhouse gas emissions from livestock

· HB 203: To allow a concealed carry licensee who is not consuming liquor and is not under the influence to carry a concealed handgun in a retail food establishment or food service operation with any class liquor permit

· HB 302: To prohibit the wasteful spending of nearly $1 million of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 funds on signs

· HB 315: To introduce the Ohio Firearms Freedom Act that will allow for firearms made and sold within the State of Ohio to be exempt from federal firearm regulations and to challenge the abuse by Congress of the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution

· HB 320: A part of the "Future of Ohio" package to afford to private sector employers the option to offer and to employees the option to accrue and use compensatory time off.

Moving Forward

I am currently working on numerous other pieces of legislation that are in various stages of the drafting process. I would like to share two of those that are very exciting.

The first is an unfunded mandate reduction for our schools. We have been working with the Ohio School Boards Association, the Buckeye Association of School Administrators, Ohio Association of School Business Officials and others to craft this legislation. An effort such as this has not taken place since 1994 when nearly $75 million of unfunded mandates were removed.

The second initiative is a pro-growth, pro-business initiative to place wind mills on Lake Erie. I have been working with the Lake Erie Task Force and other officials from the area on this. If passed, we believe this initiative would sky rocket Ohio to the forefront of wind energy development surpassing the states of New York, Pennsylvania, and Illinois who are competing with Ohio to both develop wind energy on Lake Erie and become the industry leader in wind turbine manufacturing. Ultimately, it's about retaining manufacturing jobs in Ohio.

In Closing

I am now serving on five standing House Committees which are: Public Utilities, Alternative Energy, Economic Development, Education, and Elections & Ethics Committees.

I have also been placed in a leadership position as the Ranking Member of the Alternative Energy Committee. In addition to those standing committees I serve on the Ohio Aerospace and Defense Commission and the Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunities for Military Children.

I will be attending the Greene County Central Committee meeting on Thursday and invite any comments or questions you may have regarding the legislation I have introduced or the initiatives that I am currently working on with my colleagues. Please also visit my website at: wwww.electjarrod.com for more information.

It is a pleasure to serve as your State Representative. I am honored and humbled by your continued support and I look forward to seeing you soon.

Status quo will not create jobs for Ohio

How do we create jobs and attract businesses to Ohio, a state with one of the highest tax burdens in the nation? The short answer is, we can’t—mostly because in a highly mobilized economy where businesses can relocate to better business environments, Ohio can no longer compete.

We have a talented workforce and a long history of industrious success. So why has Ohio lost 231,000 taxpayers between 1993 and 2008, 105,000 of whom relocated within the past five years? The answer is simple, yet somehow consistently overlooked by those who control Ohio’s purse strings: our state taxes are too burdensome.

The root cause of Ohio’s financial crisis is a poor business climate and heavy tax system that has systematically repelled people from the state, which has led to a shriveled state economy and smaller tax base. At the same time, uncontrolled state spending has caused unreasonable taxes on Ohio’s remaining citizens.

Businesses are not static and will relocate to states that are most business-friendly, mostly those with the lowest taxes. In turn, entrepreneurs and college graduates will go wherever the jobs are, leaving Ohio with even less revenue and jobs than before.

And based on this past budget cycle, how can we expect Ohio’s Democrats to address another revenue deficit? You guessed it—with another tax increase.

Ohio has continued this dangerous downward spiral for years, and the effects have never been clearer. Whether the economy is prospering or struggling, we cannot afford any more tax increases that will reduce spending and investments by families and businesses.

In just three decades, Ohio’s tax burden has gone from the fifth lowest to the seventh highest in the nation. Today, taxes consume approximately 10.5 percent of Ohio’s income. Even regionally, our state has fallen far behind our Midwestern neighbors that all have moderate taxes.

Yet the high spenders in the Statehouse still wonder why we are bleeding jobs and families?

First and foremost, I believe that Ohio needs to alleviate some of the tax burden on small businesses. Small businesses create 80 percent of new jobs annually, and they are the leading employer of Ohioans. For this reason, encouraging business growth and retaining our homegrown businesses is one of my top priorities as your state representative.

Additionally, I have continued to advocate for a more fiscally responsible state government, one that is lean, transparent and accountable. Before the Legislature turns to the taxpayers to bail out the state’s finances, state leaders have an obligation to ensure that each tax dollar is being spent wisely and efficiently. This is why I have staunchly supported Republican proposals to streamline spending and reduce government waste. Without first making our state government work cost-efficiently, we will be unable to improve the tax code and make Ohio nationally competitive again.

The state cannot continue to soak the taxpayers with heavy taxes, because eventually we’ll realize that there are no taxpayers left to tax.

Lawmakers should promote job growth, not hinder it

Ohio’s unemployment rate recently rose to 10.5 percent, and the Ohio Legislature should be focused on attracting, retaining and creating jobs to get people back to work. However, House Democrats have hit another nail in the coffin by raising taxes during our state’s most difficult economy in decades.

In October, a measure passed the Ohio House that will increase the tax burden on Ohio's families. House Bill 318, which was promoted by Governor Strickland and championed by House Democrats, eliminates the final installment of the 2005 income tax reductions and will increase your family’s 2009 tax rates by 4.2 percent.

Supporters of House Bill 318 claim that this bill is not a tax increase but a “tax freeze.” Essentially, this legislation changes your 2009 tax rates back to your 2008 rates and, in the process, increases your taxes retroactively. This bill is a tax increase because it “freezes” your tax rates 11 months late, which raises your taxes rather than freezing them. As a firm believer that tax increases will discourage job growth and economic development, I maintain that raising taxes at this time is irresponsible and shortsighted because it will hurt families when they are most vulnerable.

There is no question that as a Legislature, we need to adapt to the challenges that are thrown our way, and immediate action was needed to address the nearly $900 million deficit. However, House Republicans predicted this budget crisis back in January, and since that time we have offered numerous proposals to spur job growth, reduce government waste, and make state operations more efficient and effective.

The House majority has time and time again disregarded our viable alternatives to tax increases. House Republicans remain hopeful that 2010 will bring cooperative, bipartisan conversations about Ohio’s future. We need to take immediate action toward fixing what is broken with our economy, so we can revive our dying industries and bring new businesses and families to this state.

Unless we take a closer look at Ohio’s fundamental budget problems, we will continue to experience deficits and job loss year after year. Instead of returning to the taxpayers to bail us out again, the Ohio House should work cooperatively to find sustainable solutions to help, not hinder, our economic recovery.

Higher taxes are NOT the answer

Governor Strickland and House Democrat's proposal to raise taxes on families and small businesses passed the Ohio House and Senate in December. House Bill 318 will eliminate the final installment of the income tax reductions set forth in 2005, which will force taxpayers to relinquish an additional $851 million in new taxes.

Governor Strickland and House Democrats supported the 4.2 percent tax increase while ignoring House Republican calls for waste reduction and government accountability. With a heavier burden being forced upon the shoulders of entrepreneurs, House Republicans fear the effect this tax increase will have on Ohio's long-term job potential.

"We have to keep in mind the fact that taxes are more than just a way for government to raise revenues, they are also a way to modify behavior.” Martin said. “When we want to encourage a certain behavior we offer tax incentives, when we want to discourage a certain behavior we increase taxes. House Bill 318 will discourage investment by raising taxes on the people who create jobs.”

Small businesses have generated 64 percent of net new jobs over the past 15 years, according to the Small Business Association. They also employ approximately half of all workers in the U.S. and pay 44 percent of total private payroll.

House Republicans believe that raising taxes in this economy will ruin Ohio's competitiveness in creating jobs and attracting new business opportunities. With one of the top ten highest state income tax rates in the country, further raising Ohio's income taxes will compel families and businesses to relocate elsewhere.

“House Bill 318 is a tax increase on all levels, affecting the rich, poor, middle class and small businesses,” Martin said. “Ohio's leaders need to make a choice whether they would rather create jobs or continue to feed our bloated government with more waste and inefficiencies.”