About Me

My photo
Beavercreek, Ohio, United States
Showing posts with label Cut government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cut government. Show all posts

Friday, April 22, 2011

Ohio Must Act Responsibly

With the poor economic conditions we are facing, there is a lot of talk about wanting to ensure the next generation has the same opportunities that we have had. In fact, I believe we all want to leave our children with an even better future. It’s human nature to want them to have more than we did.
Some of the life lessons we teach our kids as they grow older are that you have to work to be successful, you have to save up your money and you have to be responsible in the ways that you spend it. I’m working on this right now with my own kids; my seven year old thinks he’s saving to buy himself a cell phone! The question is: why can’t our government follow that advice?

With a budget that is $8 billion in the hole, we must do everything we can to reinvent the way our state government does business. That’s why I’m supporting legislation that will get us back on the right track, including a bill that will ensure our state spends its money as efficiently as possible.

House Bill 2 reduces wasteful government spending as well as ensures our state agencies are delivering services through the most efficient structure. It requires Ohio’s state auditor to conduct a performance audit of select state agencies every two years, which will make our government more productive and responsive. As the state’s fiscal watchdog, Ohio Auditor Dave Yost is in support of this legislation and is eager to see it move forward.

We must make sure that our government operates as cost-effectively as possible and is not bogged down by layers of waste or inefficiency. House Bill 2 will offer both short-term and long-term solutions, which will save tax dollars for our families and businesses down the road.

Another way Ohioans can keep more of their hard-earned money is to ensure that they are not taxed simply because they chose to die within our borders—an egregious policy known as the estate tax. House Bill 3 aims to abolish this “death tax” because when Ohioans are taxed for working, investing and spending in this state, I see no reason why we ought to tax them for dying here, too.

Most states do not have a “death” tax, which means Ohio is put at a disadvantage and causes people to flock to other states as a means of saving their money. The tax is a hit to the middle class—farmers and small business owners like those of the 70th House District—who must face this penalty if their assets obtain a value of just $338,333 (the lowest exemption of any state).

I believe people should keep their own money. I believe children should not be punished for what they inherit from their hard-working parents. And I believe that we need to find ways of ensuring Ohioans stay here to do business and raise their families, rather than contribute to the economies of other states.

The passage of House Bill 3 is an important part of strengthening Ohio. I expect to be working hard on this and other legislation that arise in the Ohio House of Representatives. As your voice in Columbus, I will certainly keep you informed and ensure that our state is not only taking initiative on the economy, but is doing so in the most responsible way.

Thursday, June 11, 2009

The Ohio Budget And Government Savings

It is no secret that Ohio is in the middle of one of the worst budget crises in recent memory, and now more than ever it is important to present innovative and real belt tightening approaches to Ohio’s budget problems.

Currently, the state faces a budget deficit of more than $2 billion, double-digit unemployment, and a rising burden on our state’s welfare system when resources are drying up. Families are cutting back on their expenses and finding ways to scrimp and save money, and Ohioans who never needed assistance before are finding themselves asking for it now.

While families are being forced to cut expenses, our state government seems to be growing, as evidenced in the House Democrats’ version of the operating budget which increased overall spending by $1 billion. When looking for additional ways to find revenue and new funds in times of need, many minds will first turn to tax and fee increases to gain new revenues. Imposing a tax is not an option for families when they are looking for additional income. This isn’t fair to Ohio’s taxpayers who will ultimately foot the bill for our state government’s spending.

In times like these, our government in Columbus needs to look internally for cost-saving measures before one single taxpayer is asked to open their wallets. I can tell you based on my time in the Legislature that one can hardly take two steps in Columbus without tripping over an example of government waste. This is why I have joined my colleagues in the Ohio House of Representatives and co-sponsored House Bill 25 (H.B. 25) and House Bill 210 (H.B. 210).

H.B. 25 would shrink the scope of the governor’s cabinet from the current level of 24 departments and agencies to 11. To fully streamline government services, each of the government’s current functions would be grouped into divisions within the appropriate cabinet departments, thereby eliminating duplicate services and saving an estimated $1 billion annually, a real step towards a solution to our financial problems.

State government has not changed the way it has done business in more than 50 years. Removing wasteful repeats of services by consolidating agencies with similar functions will save taxpayers dollars. The House Republicans offered H.B. 25 as an amendment on the House floor as the state’s budget was being debated. The Speaker and House Democrats promptly tabled this plan that would free up $2 billion to help balance the budget.

A recently introduced piece of legislation, H.B. 210 would reduce the salaries of statewide elected officials in the next General Assembly by 5 percent until Ohio and our economy turns around. The pay cuts would equal those imposed on other state employees. It is yet to be seen what will happen to H.B. 210, but I hope to see the House recognize the necessity of this bill. As employees of both private and state jobs experience cuts in pay, it is only right that state leaders undergo pay cuts, as well.